One application · three materials · a straight answer about what they show
Rejected — and nobody will tell you why?
Nobody outside that company can tell you why with certainty — including us. What CAN be established is what your application actually showed: which of the posting's stated requirements the CV you sent evidenced and which it didn't, whether its structure survived parsing, how its wording reads against hundreds of near-identical applications, and what the timing supports. We check all of it, item by item, quote the evidence — and state plainly what can't be known from outside.
The Rejection Post-Mortem is launching very soon — this page is where ordering will open. The free resume checker and ATS simulator are live now.
Rejection Post-Mortem
£49priced in your region's currency at checkout
A structured findings report scoped to one application, delivered within 72 hours and checked by a human reviewer against our published twelve-checkpoint standard. Your fee counts toward any full package within 30 days.
- • Requirement coverage of that posting, item by item — evidenced, partial, or no evidence found
- • Hard-requirement failures: stated essential criteria your document didn't evidence at all
- • Parse hazards in the exact file you sent, grounded in our published ATS Parse Benchmark
- • Wording distinctiveness and regional-convention checks against the posting's market
- • Timing facts the dates support — arithmetic, never guesses
- • An honest reviewer's read of your target and your story
What we will NOT pretend to know
Every post-mortem ends with a section titled “What this analysis cannot determine” — and our system refuses to produce a report without it. From outside, no analysis can see:
- • Whether an internal or referred candidate was already in line
- • Whether the role was filled, frozen or quietly withdrawn
- • How your application compared with the others in the pool
- • What the hiring manager personally preferred — or whether a human read it at all
A report that guessed at those things would read well and be worthless. What you get instead is every contributor the materials CAN show, with the evidence quoted — which is exactly what you can act on for the next application.
How it works
1 · Ten minutes
Send the three materials
The posting's text, the exact CV you sent (the .docx enables the structural scan), and the rejection message — or the fact of silence, which is analysable in itself.
2 · The analysis
Machine checks + a human reviewer
The engine runs the coverage, parse, keyword, distinctiveness and convention checks; a human reviewer verifies every AI-assisted finding and writes the judgement sections. Nothing ships unverified.
3 · Within 72 hours
The report — and the next step
A ranked findings report with the evidence quoted, the honest-limits section, and a fix-first priority order. If you want the fixes done for you, your fee comes off any full package within 30 days.
Questions people ask at exactly this moment
Frequently Asked Questions
Not with certainty — and you should distrust anyone who claims otherwise. What the materials CAN show, we show item by item: which of the posting's stated requirements your CV evidenced and which it didn't, whether the document's structure survives parsing (grounded in our published parse benchmark), how distinctive its wording reads, and whether it matched the market's conventions. What can't be known from outside — internal candidates, budget freezes, what the hiring manager preferred — the report says so, plainly, in its own section.